Title of article: Introduction to Linguistics
Author of the article: Inayah Kurnia Astuti
History author: She's a graduate of Master of Linguistics at the University of Diponegoro. And a freelance writer.
Content review:
Inayah tell what it is linguistics in depth and more. Spacious enough to parse the branches of linguistics. At the beginning, Inayah invites us to get to know the language more deeply. Then, Inayah also underrate the beginner to learn about linguistics deeper. The branches are described through varied tables, which facilitate students beginning to learn about linguistics.
Advantages:
Inayah outlines detailed enough about linguistics. In fact, there are examples of sentences and words inserted by Inayah. Other advantages namely, verbal and nonverbal Inayah explained well enough. Structure of the sentence and the factors both internal and external, fairly well detailed. Language character helped tuck, and also schemes of this type there is any kind of linguistics. Nature scheme in each branch of linguistics participated in the journal added Inayah brevity. On page seven, he outlines is also part of nature sceheme intended. On page eight and nine, terselipkan well as the names of linguists, and minor and major division of linguistics. On the next page, there is also a brief definition of each branch of linguistics. On each page, it divides the explanation of each branch of linguistics briefly.
Deficiency:
In each part of linguistics that he described, the lack of resources from the linguistic as well as explanations of each expert not included much.
Conclusion:
Inayah need repairing again and add a clear source of the article, let me then, articles have been written Inayah nice. Enough for a novice who just studied linguistics at the beginning.
Source: click here
Halloha masitoh, I do not understand your article. In my opinion you just describe it about this article. And this makes me confused about this article. Can you explain it better to be understood? Thank you masitoh😊😊😊
BalasHapusThank you for the comment, Nadya! Sorry for the inconvience but I'll try my best to improve my skill writing.
HapusI'll explain it here. Basically, I've discussed about Inayah's journal which is about Introduction of Linguistics. I've put the strength and weakness yet maybe some of you couldnt tell which one is it. I'll fix it immediately!
Hi sister...
BalasHapusYour blog is good but you don't make strengthness and weakness your review article.
Thank you
Ah, sorry for making it difficult to understand.
HapusI'll explain it here. Basically, I've discussed about Inayah's journal which is about Introduction of Linguistics. I've put the strength and weakness yet maybe some of you couldnt tell which one is it. I'll fix it immediately!
Hello Masitoh..
BalasHapusI am very like your background and very interesting.I like it.
But the contents of your article I do not understand.
Very simple.
Please explain again...
KEEP SPIRIT FOR YOU.-)
Thanks for the suggestion, Netti!
HapusHey kak masitoh , i think its too short . Maybe u must know what u must have in article review , but its okay for beginner . Keep work kak
BalasHapusI've realised my article review still bear some mistakes. Thanks for reminding me!
Hapusim very like your background and very interesting but your article simple so do not understand
BalasHapusthanks you cherin. keep to hard understand my blog.
HapusHello kak. It’s very short without using a weakness and strenghnes. Please explain again ya? Thank you :)
BalasHapusplease read again siti.
HapusKomentar ini telah dihapus oleh pengarang.
BalasHapushhey dear, I think your article not complete , same like siti munawaroh says, maybe you forget to show the weaknees and strenghnes , but dear , I'm so falling in love with your blog, not with you, hahaa you have a nice blog
BalasHapusseriously not complete? can you complete say it for me.
Hapushello kak,
BalasHapusyour background nice and i think your article not complete and simple
thanks kak
thanks you for your praise. yeah i know like before comment say.
HapusHello kak masitoh... I think your article is good and I also understand what is your writing. But your background is not interesting. Can you replace it?? Thank you
BalasHapusthat's my style.
Hapuswhy your articel review so short... and you dont put stregnes n weaknes of your articel
BalasHapusit's my review that's why so short.
HapusHey Masitoh , Your blog is very colorless, making me choose to escape. And I'm sure the reader will choose to sleep, watch tv, etc. Than looking at your blog.And your article review is very incomprehensible and weightless. Makes my eyes tired to read! Byee
BalasHapusJust watch your freaking tv than read my blog. :p
Hapusyour article dont pull the same like you
BalasHapusI think your post too short make it still long but can easy to read it.. 😊Thanks
BalasHapusHello kak masitoh ..
BalasHapusYour explain not complete kak make me not understand, can you explain to me that i better understand?
Hey masitoh , can you expain each part of the introduction to linguistic ?
BalasHapusOMG an article on the blog of yours. I read him so his innate sleep at sleepy
BalasHapus